Search
Posts by Tag
Main Topics
Backup History
Visit our Archives Page.

Posts Tagged ‘security’

Are You Paranoid Enough? FileSlinger™ Backup Reminder 03-07-08

Friday, March 7th, 2008

Now and again I talk about aspects of data security that aren’t directly related to backups. I don’t do it often, because I’m not a security expert, but there’s more than one way to lose your data, and stories about backup tapes stolen from financial institutions and missing laptops with confidential information on them show up in the news pretty often.

The security of your backups can be an issue for everyone. If someone broke in and stole your external hard drive, would they get everything? Most small and home office users have at least some information that shouldn’t be available to anyone who finds a USB key lying on a taxi seat. So we should all take basic precautions and not make it easy for those with harmful intent.

I saw an announcement about a new service called BlogBackupr the other day and flagged it as something to investigate. As a backup blogger, I’m certainly in favor of backing up your blog. (I’m not at all in favor of that awkward name; even “Blog Backer-Upper” would be more euphonious.) Before I could check the service out, however, I saw a post from Ike Pigott warning readers about a the way any provider of such a service could abuse the login and password information for your blog.

And just in case I wasn’t feeling paranoid enough after reading Ike’s post, I got a link to a new white paper from Bitpipe this morning: “How to Fully Protect Your Storage Environment.” (You’ll have to register to download it, if you’re interested.) The section that caught my eye was “Why and How Your Storage Environment Will Be Attacked,” by Kevin Beaver.

While the guide addresses enterprise storage, a few points apply to smaller businesses and home users as well:

    1. Storage security does not equal redundant systems and good backups. These two elements are only part of what’s going to keep your data safe and sound, so it’s important not to solely rely on them as has been done in the past.
    2. Storage encryption is not the silver bullet. Not for data at rest and not for data in transit.

The truth is, we all have to trust someone with our data sometime. Even if you run your own web and mail servers, even if you avoid online backup services, the only way to protect your data against fire, flood, and theft onsite is to move copies of the data offsite—which means it’s vulnerable in transit and at its destination. And most companies providing backup and storage solutions limit their liability pretty severely.

The malicious hackers are way ahead of most of us, too. They know more ways to attack than we’re aware we should defend.

So what’s a sensible person to do?

If you work with really sensitive data, it’s probably worth hiring a security expert. Otherwise, take the obvious precautions. If it’s small and portable (and even my twelve-ton, 17-inch laptop qualifies for that category), put a password on it. And store your passwords in a password-protected program. Don’t leave your data unattended. Do provide someone in your company or family with your master password in the event you are injured or killed and they need access to your data, but make sure that person knows how important it is not to hand out that information.

Check out any storage services you’re thinking of using before you sign up: search on Technorati and in places like Yelp to find out what people are saying about them. One or two negative reviews is normal, but if you find pages and pages of complaints, stay away. If a storage company is making headlines because of lost or stolen data, choose someone else.

At least most of us SOHO users can comfort ourselves with the knowledge that we are just too insignificant for serious hackers to bother with. The payoff for stealing your PIN number is fairly small. The payoff for stealing millions of credit card numbers from a bank is a lot higher.

But don’t let that make you careless.

FileSlinger™ Backup Reminder 05-05-06: There’s Data Protection, and Then There’s Data Protection

Friday, May 5th, 2006
Last week Faithful Reader Mike Van Horn suggested that since the real purpose of backup, and therefore this newsletter, is protecting data, I should talk about protecting data in other ways, specifically the issue of securing computers against theft.

Unfortunately, I know nothing at all about this subject, apart from the fact that when the Ur-Guru needs to leave his laptop in a hotel room, he puts it in his unbreakable Samsonite suitcase and then uses a cable with a combination lock and alarm to secure said suitcase to a large piece of furniture, like a bed.

I’ve owned and traveled with laptops since 1994 and never had one stolen, possibly because I don’t let them out of my sight (or, usually, grasp) unless locked in the trunk of the car. Mostly, though, I think I’ve been lucky. Actually, I know I’ve been lucky, as on a couple of occasions I’ve managed to leave the house unlocked when I went out, but came home to find all my possessions where I left them.

Iron Mountain hasn’t been so lucky: they just lost more backup tapes. Just because the storage giant acquired LiveVault and its Continuous Data Protection technology doesn’t mean all its data-storage customers have switched from tape-based to disk-based backup. But I’ve talked about the vulnerability of tapes in trucks before (in the March 4, 2005 backup reminder), and nothing much has changed on that front, so I won’t repeat myself here.

Instead I’ll replay my generally-uneducated answer to the theft question and then ask readers for their input.

Mike’s Question:

“I’ve done a few Google searches on security kits for computers. I’m surprised at the paucity of good solutions. Laptops have cable locks with flimsy connections to the computer that I’ve been told can easily be broken off. With larger computers, you can encase them in metal, like Robocop, or else super glue a D-ring onto the case, to which you can attach a cable and lock. Why aren’t computers designed with a better security connection?”

My Answer:

“I don’t know whether people prefer to have insurance, or what. Some people have systems with removable drives, so they can take their data home at night. (Complete computer towers and servers are bulkier to shift than laptops.) Of course, data centers have security guards at the doors and keep the machines in wire cages, with nothing but dumb terminals out in the open.

“The less accessible your machine is for thieves, the less accessible it is for you or your IT repair staff. Most modern tower machines can be opened with a simple latch pull, and unhooking the drive and the various boards is a trivial effort. That makes taking the whole tower away rather beside the point, particularly if it’s your business data they’re after and not just salable parts–though they can still realize a substantial profit on anything they rebuild from the components they take from you.

“I think protecting your computers is a bit like protecting your car. A garage that thieves can’t get into is going to do you a lot more good than a car alarm.”

One thing I didn’t think of at the time is that there’s a difference between protecting your data and protecting your hardware. Good encryption can protect your data from all but the most skilled hackers even if all your hardware gets hauled off in a truck. (Without off-site backups, though, you may not have any more access to your data than the thieves do.) But encryption, like locks and steel cages, makes working with the data yourself more trouble. This is part of why most of us only encrypt a few files at best. I password-protect my Quicken files and the PDFs of my tax returns, as well as invoices and contracts. I also password-protect sensitive client data, and my own collection of passwords. But anyone stealing my computer or my XHD would still get some pretty comprehensive information about me.

Mike asked what I’d heard from other readers on the subject of protecting computers against theft. Nothing, so far—but I’m hoping that will change. Any of you with experience in this area, please send your recommendations to sallie@fileslinger.com or post them here on the blog (click the little link below that says “comments”).

See you next week with more backup news!

Banking on Backups: FileSlinger™ Backup Reminder 3-4-05

Friday, March 4th, 2005
Lost backups seem to be the theme of the week. There was the break-in at Lasso Logic (see my March 2 Backup Blog entry), where some enterprising thief (or competitor) made off with the backup servers, for instance. But the big scandal is the disappearance of more than a million SmartPay® records somewhere between Bank of America and its backup facility.

SmartPay® is a General Service Administration program to provide charge cards to government employees and contractors. Bank of America is one of five financial institutions responsible for these accounts, and the missing backup tapes contained customer and account information for 1.2 million government employees, including senators Patrick Leahy and Elizabeth Dole.

If verifying tape backups is rare, encrypting them is even rarer. I don’t normally encrypt my backups, and neither do most people I know.

On the other hand, I keep my Quicken data, my passwords, and any proprietary or financial information about my clients in encrypted files. Doubtless any really professional hacker could still break into them, just as such a person could figure out my Windows Logon password easily enough. But it’s enough to keep casual burglars and curious visitors out of my files.

And if I can do that much, you’d think a bank would realize it needed to encrypt its backup tapes. Banks are, after all, the most obvious targets for large-scale data theft. Bank accounts belonging to the government are, if possible, even more tempting targets. (After all, whose card would you expect to be able to charge more to, mine or Uncle Sam’s?)

I personally find the fact that it was those particular tapes which were stolen highly suspicious, and the disappearance raises a great many questions about other aspects of the transport and security of Bank of America’s backup tapes. Do they send them in armored cars with guards? If not, why not? Pound for pound, the information on those tapes is worth more than cash. If so, then how did the tapes get mislaid? Was this an inside job? Do I need to take my money out of Bank of America? (But if I do, would it actually be any safer elsewhere?)

One hopes that this incident, and certain other recent highly-publicized cases of data theft, will cause financial institutions and other corporations to re-evaluate their backup policies. Continuity Central has some suggestions, including using RFID tags, bar codes, or even GPS locators on the tapes for better tracking, encrypting the tapes, and not using tapes at all. All of those sound like good suggestions to me.

Small and home office users probably don’t need to go as far as bar codes, RFID, or GPS, but I strongly advise you to password-protect not just the backups of any sensitive information you have, but the files themselves. Outlook PST files, ACT! databases, and Quicken and QuickBooks account files can all be password-protected. And your passwords themselves should be password-protected. (There are several freeware products for this, and others which will generate random passwords with as many characters as you want.) If you have lots of sensitive data or many people have access to your office, you definitely need a logon password, and might want to consider a LockBox drive for your backups.

And you might just want to ask your bank what it’s doing to keep your account information secure.

FileSlinger Backup Blog at Blogged

 

Blogging Blog Directory
BlogWithIntegrity.com
Google Ads